Read: Five Years in a Persian Town


Five Years in a Persian Town. Napier Malcolm. New York: E.P. Dutton, 1907. Pages 86-96.

not proofread

[page 86]

      There are in Persia sects which are only nominally Mussulman, and which largely owe their origin to non-Mohammedan sources. The Safis, for instance, are only half Mohammedan, and their philosophy is really pantheistic. Sufis are to be found in Yezd, but there are not very many serious ones, and the sect has largely lost its direct influence in the country. But the Babis, of whom the Beha! branch is rapidly spreading everywhere throughout the Persian towns, have been influenced by Sufi ideas to a much greater extent than have the orthodox Shiahs, who, we agreed, are not - pantheistic. Perhaps some professing Behdis are really very near to the Sufis in ideas, but this is not the case with the more orthodox, who, though they have modified the fundamental doctrines of Mohammedanism in such a way as to remove the gulf between God and the prophet, have not produced a theology which is free from the obvious defects of that of Islam. The Belid! appears to hold that the superior prophet, that is, the book- bearer, is in every case an incarnation of the Deity, but lie goes on to say that there is an absolute distinction between the prophet and his people; for the book-bearer is God, and the

[page 87]

people are not God; nor are they, so far as I can understand, capable of receiving the Spirit of God, either from the prophet or directly from God Himself. They can only be impressed by the prophet as wax is impressed by a seal. Whether this doctrine is really Behau'llah's or not, it was certainly given to me by men who ought to have known the truth about the Belia! faith.

      The adherents of this sect in Persia are now exceedingly numerous, and many people believe that in the end the whole country will become Behmi; so the question whether the Beh57is are more reliable than the orthodox Shiahs has become an important one. Certainly they teach a cleaner and purer doctrine on points of ethics; but what Persia needs is not so much a higher moral teaching, but rather a higher basis for morality. A religion that puts the command- ment not to steal on the same level as the

direction not to stew your dates but to fry them, will never produce the high characters that are to be found in such communities as the Parsi. It would be irreverent to compare such a faith with the religion given to us by the Saviour.

      During the late BehO massacre, I had the

[page 88]

opportunity of discussing what was going on with a Behai muballigh, that is, an authorised Beh-a-1 teacher and missionary. I have no in- tention of unnecessarily dwelling on the ghastly horrors that were then being perpetrated, but a few details are unavoidable. The Belidi sec- taries were not at that time being executed before the mujtahids, but were being torn in pieces by the crowd. What had excited the people was not simply religious feeling, but it was very largely the statement by the clerical authorities that the goods of the Belidis were "lawful," that is, that any one might plunder them who cared to do so. The attacks were often made by men who had lived for a long while in close companioDship with the Behais. knowing them all the time to be members of the sect, and yet consorting and eating with them freely. Holes were bored in the heads of some of these poor wretches with awls, oil was then poured into the hole and lighted. Other forms of torture were used about which one cannot write. Women and children were very seldom actually killed, but were fearfully ill- treated, and sometimes left to die of starvation. It was reported that in one of the villages-Babi

[page 89]

children died within full sight of the villagers, after waiting for days' under the trees where their murdered parents had left them.

      The Behd! muballigh with whom I was talking was certainly well aware, in a general way, of what was going on; yet I could not get him to see that these things, done in the name of religion to his own sect, were in themselves wrong, and that man's eyes had been opened, or could be opened, to their essential wrongness. Of course he maintained that the action of the Mussulmans was evil, but his reason was that, in the first place, those persecuted- were spiritually right, and, in the second place, even had they not been so, the last book-bearer~ the Behau'llah, had promulgated a Divine commandment that there

was to be -no religious persecution. I then asked him if such persecution could again become lawful if another book-bearer appeared and promulgated a different commandment. He answered that it was impossible for another book-bearer to appear for a long period. I then asked him if he would accept a new book-bearer, who, besides satisfying the other conditions, exhibited a text in one of the previously received Scriptures, stating that one day in God's sight is - as a thousand

[page 90]

years. He replied that, if such a verse could be shown, and the other conditions were satisfied, such a man might be accepted to-morrow, even although he taught a doctrine similar to that of Mohammed about religious persecution and other matters of the same sort.

      Now there are three points to be noted by those who expect great things of the Beha! move- ment. First of all, the Behdis accept the whole of the Jewish and Christian Scriptures, which, of course, include a verse of the kind above mentioned. Secondly, they have already had three book-bearers'; the Bab, who was the original founder of the Babi sects, and who not only exhibited a Divine book, but also claimed to be the resurrection of Mohammed in the same way that Mohammed was the resurrection of Jesus; Subhi Azal, whom for some years they recognised as the Bab's successor; and lastly, Behau'llah, whom the Behdis now hold to be the only major prophet of the three. Thirdly, the BebYis, in attempting to prove that the Bab was a lesser prophet and a mere forerunner of the Behau'llah, and also that Subhi Azal was never a really great personage, have seriously falsified their records. The reader who desires further informa-

[page 91]

tion on this subject cannot do better than consult Professor E. G. Browne's admirable introduction to his translation of the Tdr~khi Jad0.

      The Bab, who came forward rather less than a century ago, was a young Shirazi Persian, a Seyid of the merchant class, whose real name was Ali Mohammed. The Shaikhi sect were at that time predicting the appearance of a great religious leader, and the Bab came forward claim- ing to be this prophet. He called himself the Bab, or Gate of Knowledge, and was at first supposed by his followers to be the Gate of Access to the Mehdi; but he seems to have used these terms in a very broad and allegorical fashion, and to have held the doctrine of the essential unity of all book-bearers. He later declared himself to be the - Mehdi, and also to be the Gate of Access to One Whom God should manifest.

      The movement caused a great deal of fighting in Persia, and though the Babis were acting on the defensive, there is very little doubt that they had harboured political designs. The Bab, how- ever, differs from Mohammed in having been, so far as we can judge, primarily' a religious reformer, and having done his best to make the movement as spiritual as possible. His followers

[page 92]

were treated with the most barbarous severity, and he himself was after a few years put to death. Before this be appointed Subhi Azal, one of his followers, to be his successor, and for a few years this man was received as " He Whom God should manifest." Later on, Subhi Azal's half-brother, the Belidu'llah, managed to get himself accepted as head of the sect. Many of the followers of Subhi Azal were assassinated, and the sect was re-organised with some important differences. It now purports to be absolutely non-political, and the teaching has become more simple and practical. The Belidis are anxious to retain the use of the Quran, so as to preserve their claim to toleration, although they imagine that the law of the Quran no longer stands, its place having been taken by a later revelation. Partially to avoid inconsistency in this matter, and partially to keep before the minds of the Mussulmans the possibility of one really divine book being replaced by another, they encourage the reading of all the Scripture considered divine by Mohammedans, that is, not only the Quran, but also the whole of the Christian Bible, nor do they generally call the authenticity of the extant version in question,

[page 93]

      Behalism is obviously an attempt to adapt Jlslam to the exigencies of modern circumstances, taking advantage of the special tenets of the Shiahs. The North of Persia is being at present rapidly overrun by Itussia, and even in the South the Persian feels that he is on the eve of political changes. The Belidis consider that they have a creed which enables them to meet the foreigner without continual jar and offence. In this they are right, for they do not veil their women, they do not consider infidels unclean, and they go further than does the broadest Shiah in the matter of respect to other forms of faith. Some orthodox Shiahs accept the Jewish and Christian Scriptures as they stand, without pressing the story that the Jews and Christians altered their books to suit-their own purposes. Almost all Persians are open to argument on this point, though most will say that to those possessed of the Qm-an the perusal of former Scriptures is unnecessary. But the Behals hold that, unless started by a real prophet, no religion can possibly survive, and consequently they allow to even the grossest forms of idolatry -a divine origin, and the posses- sion of a certain substratum of truth.

      In Persia there can never have been that

[page 94]

almost impenetrable wall of dogmatic assertion and self-assurance which seems to exist in many Sunni lands, but something of the kind is to be found throughout Islam. As the self-satisfaction of the Beha! is almost as strong as that of the Sunni, and infinitely stronger than that of the Shiab, it seems a paradox to say that 13abiism has given us in Persia a prepared soil for missionary work. The fact is that the field prepared is not amongst the Babis themselves, but amongst the Shiahs who have been in touch with Babis, and are nevertheless unconvinced. Consequently it is a field which cannot be expected to last for ever, but of which advantage ought to be taken immediately, for it is very seldom that we find so exceptional an opportunity given to us for attacking Mohammedanism on its own ground.

      In Yezd the Behdis have attached to them- selves many of the most enlightened Mussulmans. The teaching of the sect about behaviour and practice is not bad, though, in matters connected with women, there is an inclination to adopt customs that are rather dangerous considering the low moral atmosphere. - The tendency to minimise the miraculous element in religion is not altogether wholesome, and some professing

[page 95]

Babis are inclined to a rather crude rationalism, the end of which it is difficult to foresee. This tendency is perhaps fostered by the peculiar manner of interpreting the sacred books, a method difficult to describe, as it fluctuates between the wildest flights of metaphor, and the lowest depths of puerile literalism, the balance between the two being decided by a very determined pre- conception of * what ought to be. To give a specimen of this, it was seriously urged in a Behaii pamphlet, reviewed and summarised by the Itev. W. A. Rice in the Church Missionary Intelligencer, that Isaiah xxv. 6-9, where God is described as making " unto all people a feast of fat things, a feast of wine on the lees, of fat things full of marrow, of wines on the lees well refined," refers to the entertaining of visitors by Behau'llah during his banishment at Acre. The "wines on the lees well refined " are the tea, which Persians generally pour through a small strainer. The passage also refers to the fact that God " will swallow up death in victory," and will 11 wipe away all tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of His people shall He take away from off all the earth." To this part only a spiritual interpretation is given.

      I tried before I left Persia to find out the

[page 96]

impression that the sect had made upon other Europeans, so as not to give a one-sided opinion about them. Personally, I came to the conclusion that, in matters even remotely connected with religion, they were less truthful than the ordinary Shiah, but that in the ordinary affairs of life they were a trifle more reliable. Some other missionaries had a lower opinion of their truthful- ness, and most of those who had had business dealings with them considered that they were not more trustworthy than ordinary Mussulmans. My conclusion is that, though they may succeed in establishing their creed in Persia, and may even make the Persians more easy to deal with, they will not greatly alter the moral character of the people. They have not done so hitherto, and an examination of their faith shows that they cling, in the main, to the Mussulman theory of the paighambari, or at any rate have not changed it for a doctrine which gives a man more cogent reasons for adhering to an approved line of conduct in times of difficulty. v2.7 (213613) © 2005 - 2015 Emanuel V. Towfigh & Peter Hoerster | Imprint | Change Interface Language: DE EN